Computer Science: My Expirience

It's a bit too early to be speaking of the career you've dreamed to have once you realized what you want to do in your life... isn't it?

Yes! My dream is to be a Hardware Engineer once I'm done with my school life and gone through adolescence completely. The type of Hardware Engineer I want to be is one to be planning and making the architectures for either Intel or AMD APUs (Processors with an integrated GPU)
Both are excellent Hardware manufactures. There are many differences between Intel and AMD CPUs: One being made faster with virtual cores and One using Actual Logical Processors to make the machine faster for the consumer's needs. from Idle Processing to Processes that may kill your computer in terms of usability, I will be explaining differences between AMD and Intel CPUs: From lowest to highest range (In terms of model, Power Usage, Processing Performance for Professional/Gaming tasks and Value)
Note: I will not Include the AMD A series of processors here because from A2 - A10, I'd have to make an entire word document in order to complete the chart as each variation has different results in terms of wholesome usability. Anywho, Let's carry onto the chart!

AMD Athlon vs. Intel Celeron: There is no competition here, The Athlon wins in every aspect of this chart. This little thing blows the damn Celeron out of the water. For being bellow 300$, this thing can even give the high-end i3 a run for its' money if you give it the proper specs it needs to do so. Otherwise, It's there with the Pentiums.

AMD Athlon vs. Intel Pentium (Silver/Gold): The Athlon beats the Silver because it is made to be either a Y or M model (Ya know... made for portable laptops, made for typing on an airplane or somethin') but the Gold and Athlon are neck-on-neck. The Gold can do Gaming and some Professional tasks, the Athlon (even having lower clock speeds) absolutely destroys the Gold in terms of Graphics. They both can still tie if you give them proper specs to seemingly make them run like a pro machine. But in other cases, they are tied.

AMD Athlon vs. Intel Core i3: There can be some conflict between these 2 (based on Performance and Clock speeds), but if this was a fair fight, the i3 just destroys the Athlon in terms of performance: Sure they both might have 2 cores, but like i said: These 2 are completely different when it comes to building their Processors. Intel uses Virtual cores in order to make it perform better than it ever would than it ever would with its' Independent Dual-Core build. from 2 cores to making seem to perform like a Quad-Core build. They both have 4 threads, but Intel has Hyper-Threading, (Again) Improving the computer's performance as a whole. AMD has a proper Overclocking utility (Unlike Intel: where you have to overclock by entering the BIOS), so that the CPU will have higher clock speeds while (If you can) maintain the Watt TDP at its original state or even decrease the TDP as much as you want to... Just not a critically unstable state.
I would talk more about their differences, but I don't have that much time in my hands. So all-in-all: The i3 beats the Athlon because of the different Architectural build.

AMD Ryzen 3 vs. Intel Core i3: Actually, there are not that many differences between these 2. The only differences between these 2 are the way they build them (One being a Physical Architecture while the other being a Hybrid of Virtual and Physical Architecture) and power consumption, With the Usual TDP being at the least bellow 100W. In terms of performance: Both of them are mostly similar. Of course, Intel with their Architectural Building make their CPUs faster with Virtualization, but AMD offered a Quad-Core build from the start. The only thing missing here is the Hyper-Threading... and for that same reason, the Core i3 won the performance side of things, but on Ryzen: they won in terms for On-Board Graphics.

Welp, that's the chart for ya! The 2nd part will be the CPUs for enthusiasts! So don't miss that out!
See ya on the next one!